Criminal Justice

Plagiarism

100%

unique text

Download this

Should the judge grant that request? Why?

Yes, States security depends on how secure her citizens are. First, MaCavity is a suspect of drug trafficking, robbery with violence and arms dealer making him a threat to homeland security.. In the case De Veau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. 144, 155 (1960) in denying the defendant bail the court ruled that the state had a compelling interest in preventing crime by the arrestee. If realized on bail there is fear that he may commit more crimes.

MaCavity is a dangerous criminal and a drug dealer and very powerful in the crime world. Drug dealers are at the heart of money laundry, where they accumulate a lot of wealth, power and influence, if released on bail, he is likely to interfere with the witness and investigations. In reference to Cf. Carbo v. United States, 82 S.Ct. 662, 7 L.Ed.2d 769 (1962), the bail was denied when it was found that the accused would interfear with the witness.

Should the motion to suppress be granted? Why?

No, the evidence is admissible and the search warrant is valid. Moreover In reference to Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 (1960), the court ruled that a search warrant may be properly issued on the basis of hearsay. Thus the search warrant was validly issued. Moreover, referring to Campbell v. Minnesota, 487 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1973). The warrant was validly issued as the Supreme Court ruled that a warrant can be issued upon reliance of oral testimony, which on this case was the testimony was given by McGee. Thus the search warrant was valid and the evidence should not be excluded.